WEBVTT

00:00:05,338 --> 00:00:05,739
Some of the

00:00:05,739 --> 00:00:10,944
misconceptions relate to the perceived
infinite Sharpe ratios in private

00:00:10,944 --> 00:00:14,614
asset classes
because the marking has been slower.

00:00:14,948 --> 00:00:18,485
What we're seeing now with the drawdowns
in the listed BDC space,

00:00:18,885 --> 00:00:23,256
is that a lack of liquidity
doesn't necessarily translate

00:00:23,256 --> 00:00:26,259
into or equate to a lack of risk.

00:00:29,162 --> 00:00:32,165
Some of the model-based approaches
that have worked

00:00:32,265 --> 00:00:37,003
very well in equity
markets can lead you down some dangerous

00:00:37,003 --> 00:00:41,875
paths in the credit markets,
because the data quality is so different.

00:00:42,342 --> 00:00:45,812
There needs to be an understanding
of how the data was created

00:00:46,146 --> 00:00:49,149
and what it actually means.

00:00:51,017 --> 00:00:52,385
Historically,

00:00:52,385 --> 00:00:55,688
public and private markets,
which are very different markets,

00:00:55,922 --> 00:00:58,958
the combination of those
has been quite complex

00:00:58,958 --> 00:01:03,163
because of all of the differences
in data and investment structures.

00:01:03,496 --> 00:01:07,133
And all that complexity
has been put on allocators.

00:01:07,967 --> 00:01:11,471
With borrowers
now having much greater fluidity

00:01:11,771 --> 00:01:15,141
and versatility
in how they approach the capital markets,

00:01:15,408 --> 00:01:16,409
there's an opportunity

00:01:16,409 --> 00:01:20,413
for a lot of that complexity
to be put on investment managers.

00:01:23,516 --> 00:01:25,485
The matrix is a really simple tool,

00:01:25,485 --> 00:01:29,222
but it has helped to ground the client
conversations

00:01:29,456 --> 00:01:32,459
around some key objectives, namely,

00:01:32,559 --> 00:01:35,528
“What
is their tolerance for illiquidity?,”

00:01:35,595 --> 00:01:38,498
“How much credit risk
are they willing to take?,”

00:01:38,498 --> 00:01:41,267
and, “What type of return
objective are they targeting?”