Credit Suisse: Five Key Takeaways
UBS saves its troubled long-time Swiss rival – what’s next?
Jul 15, 2022
Jennison Associates’ 3Q22 Outlook explains why durable growth stocks are more attractive in a slowdown and highlights attributes for macro-resilient companies.
Over the past year, the investment backdrop has transformed from one of stimulus and spending to one of inflation and tightening financial conditions, with the battle to control inflation moving aggressively to the fore. Investors remain concerned around the Fed’s willingness to take the measures necessary to combat historically high inflation, despite the recently stepped-up magnitude and pace of rate increases and language communicating a “whatever it takes” approach to the problem. The uncomfortable truth for policymakers is that the primary sources of elevated headline inflation this year are supply driven—tied directly to the conflict in Ukraine and the related Russia sanctions—which challenges the effectiveness of monetary policy as a tool for addressing the problem. Meanwhile, an intensifying slowdown in activity around the globe and rising concerns over recession in many economies will confront investors and policymakers as the second half of the year unfolds. In that vein, the Fed’s task of bringing inflation back to its 2% target without undermining the robust employment backdrop and precipitating a recession underscores current uncertainty around the macro outlook.
In our view, we are not yet at the point where a U.S. recession is an inevitable outcome, but the prospects for one continue to build in Europe. Coincidentally, companies are approaching their planning with the recognition that the intermediate-term outlook poses greater uncertainty today than it did when the year began. Adjustments in hiring plans and greater impact from foreign currency translation on reported profits are among the shifts that are impacting full-year financial outlooks at this stage.
The advantages and attributes of high-quality growth companies tend to attract greater attention from investors during slowing periods, given their relative resiliency to economic headwinds. For much of the past 40 years, disinflation was the common theme, and interest rates trended lower, particularly during economic slowdowns. In the current cycle, however, a spike in inflation has forced policymakers and the market to respond with sharply higher interest rates, pushing up the discount rate investors apply to the value of future cash flows for many growth companies. As a result, the overall valuations of these stocks have adjusted significantly to this impact over the past several months, returning to pre-pandemic levels.
We believe companies best placed to withstand the slowdown have unique products and services that address demands in growing markets through innovation and agility. They have strong balance sheets and financial flexibility, which should allow them to gain market share from weaker competitors, while continuing to invest for future growth throughout the period.
Value continued to outperform Growth across all market-cap segments during the second quarter. Along with energy, defensive sectors such as consumer staples, utilities, and health care held up better during the quarter. Growth sectors like consumer discretionary, communication services, and information technology were the weakest. But over the long term, we believe the market should continue to favor growth companies with asset-light business models, subscription model revenue streams, disruptive products, large total addressable markets (TAM), and faster organic growth with long runways of opportunity. This is especially true as the overall economic environment is expected to slow back to its post global financial crisis average.
The S&P 500 Index’s information technology sector was down -20.2% in the second quarter of 2022 and was one of the worst performing sectors in the broader market S&P 500, which was down -16.1% in the quarter. The quarter was a continuation of the give-back trend we’ve seen since November 2021 from especially strong technology results the previous two+ years.
The short-term difficult macro environment, along with negative global economic sentiment through 2023, continued to drive stock prices. As a result, performance in the quarter was driven by multiple compressions and the ongoing normalization of earnings to pre-COVID levels, especially for technology. This has also led to the lowering of forward guidance into 2023 for many companies in the secular growth basket, thus compounding the situation for these stocks. Nevertheless, the longer-term underlying strength in these business models and their secular trends remain solid. This is reflected in the industry results within the sector, where areas that have some of the highest levels of long-duration earnings growth (IT services, software, and semiconductors) had the largest negative performance
The current macro uncertainty was the driver behind this. Factors such as rising rates (occurring quickly), persistent inflation, the hawkish Fed, energy supply, China turbulence, and then the Ukraine invasion are responsible for the uncertainty and thus the resulting elevation of the discounting mechanism for equities. It is thus not surprising that the longest duration equities (areas such as secular growth and especially technology stocks) had the worst performance and the highest levels of multiple compression. It does not look like the current environment is expected to change in the short run (risk levels will remain elevated), so on a go-forward basis we can expect continued volatility and consolidation for the technology sector, both relative and absolute.
We also see continued acceleration and long-duration technology demand from the large global millennial population, given their early uptake of so many digital economy related products (many of which are driven through the smartphone) that are solving their real-world problems. We believe these large, global-oriented total addressable markets provide an ample runway for long-duration top- and bottom-line growth, with many disruptive trends expected to double over the next three to five years. Historically, earlier stages of mass adoption have spurred more innovation, greater ease of use, and an expansion of the ecosystem, which in turn has kept the virtuous cycle spinning with yet greater adoption.
In the second quarter, the health care sector declined 5.9%, which outperformed the S&P 500 Index that lost 16.1%. Over the trailing 12-months, the health care sector rose 3.4% compared to the Index’s 10.6% decline.
The investment environment at the start of 2022 was clouded by uncertainties related to the pandemic, inflation, and the prospect of slowing growth on the back of the Federal Reserve’s plans for policy tightening. As we move further into 2022, it is our view that the impact from COVID, coupled with many headwinds the sector faced in 2021, is subsiding. We believe the sector has begun to show signs of leadership again, as investors place more emphasis on stable company fundamentals and the significant alpha generating opportunity that broad innovation in the sector can provide. Furthermore, drug pricing legislation is back in the headlines. We continue to believe that the bills being discussed will be manageable and have a limited impact on the sector. We ultimately believe that clarity on drug pricing would remove a six-year overhang and be a long-term positive for the sector, in particular, biotech. More specifically, now that some “action” is potentially being taken on drug pricing the likelihood of any draconian changes that were potentially negative for the industry are off the table. A “no news” stance out of Washington, coupled with the appointment of an FDA commissioner, should position health care well into 2023.
In what was a very ugly equity market (negative returns for all S&P sectors) in the second quarter, the financials sector modestly underperformed the broader market returning -17.5% versus the -16.1% return of the S&P 500 Index. While the expectation of Fed hikes was a tailwind for financials earlier in the year, this has since been offset by geopolitical conflict and inflationary pressure, which have given rise to concerns that we may be headed toward a recession. The sector would be negatively impacted if this occurred, specifically around higher credit losses and slowing consumer/business activity. This concern has showed up across all risk assets. Despite the negative return in the second quarter, financials have outperformed the S&P 500 Index by more than 400 basis points over the last 18 months.
While the sector’s fundamentals are experiencing some labor cost pressures, this has been offset by the continued, albeit non-linear, economic recovery, improved tech-driven efficiencies, better credit conditions, interest rate hike announcements and the lingering effects of the second stimulus. Nevertheless, the market is less concerned with these dynamics and is solely focused on the expectation of a hard economic landing and the course of Fed tightening.
Despite the gathering storm clouds, the current environment is supportive of banks from a relative basis given modest loan growth, improving interest income from rising rates, ample loan loss reserves, and credit conditions that remain solid enough to absorb some expected deterioration. Property and casualty insurance remains a safe haven given its defensive nature and strong pricing dynamics. Additionally, both industries have attractive valuations and reasonable earnings floors to support the stocks under a more difficult macro environment.
Despite a negative return in 2Q, midstream infrastructure continues to be a strong performer in the 19 months since the COVID vaccine announcement in late 2020. While midstream—and energy broadly—outperformed the S&P 500 once again in the second quarter, energy was the worst-performing sector of the market in the month of June. Despite the fact that fundamentals and cyclical tailwinds remain intact, broader macro concerns as well as technical factors weighed on the group toward the end of the quarter. For the full three-month period, the Alerian MLP Index lost over 7%, while the Alerian Midstream Energy Index, which includes a broader group of midstream infrastructure companies as well as MLPs, fell by more than 8%.
Midstream energy has been a sector in transition for several years. Most of the larger companies have taken decisive measures to conserve cash and “right-the-ship” during this global pandemic, and we believe this disciplined behavior will continue. Cash-flow metrics have improved across the board after companies reduced capex and growth spending over the last two years. Many larger companies are now free cash flow positive for the first time, an important inflection point reached in 2021. Added cost reductions and increased asset optimization should continue to fortify balance sheets, while offering management teams further opportunities to reduce debt levels as well as return cash to shareholders.
Recent weakness aside, improvements in fundamentals were finally starting to be reflected in stock prices. While a recovery is clearly underway, it will likely continue to be non-linear, as the world is still dealing with COVID and intermittent lockdowns in China. While it is likely that we have seen the last of severe global economic shocks due to the pandemic, hiccups along the way—whether pandemic- or geopolitically-induced—should be expected. However, as economic activity continues to ramp up, stocks should increasingly price in the long-term positive benefits from the significant transformational corporate reform that has occurred over the past few years. The group is well-positioned for performance beyond the cyclical recovery.
The global energy transition will require multiple sources of energy to be successful. Hydrocarbons will continue to have a role, driving future demand not just for the commodities but for the essential logistical systems that move them. With physical steel in the ground, midstream infrastructure companies have difficult-to-replicate asset networks with high barriers to entry, and whose adaptability to transport other energy sources is underappreciated. Management teams are increasingly aware of the role they will play in our energy future, focusing not just on the environmental impact of their operations but also on how their asset bases can and will be part of a greener future.
Following a rally that began in December of 2021, the utilities sector continued to outperform the broader market in the second quarter. Despite the relative outperformance, the sector posted negative returns. While concerns about rising rates, high commodity prices and an investigation into solar tariffs weighed on the group during the quarter, utilities continued to benefit from being a “safe haven” sector, which has helped drive both strong gains in the first quarter and relative outperformance in the first half of 2022. While utilities finished the period down 5.1%, the group ended the second quarter 1100 basis points ahead of the S&P 500.
Utilities have seen a meaningful recovery in the last three quarters. The group had been the worst-performing sector on a trailing two-year basis prior to 2Q22, despite strong fundamentals. Even during this period of economic volatility, the companies have continued to execute operationally and deliver strong earnings while also de-risking their portfolios. The gap in performance has closed, with utilities now outperforming the S&P 500 by more than 6% over the last 24 months. Continued solid execution, along with the potential growth opportunities from renewable energy investments, should help to drive the sector’s earnings going forward. In addition, geopolitical concerns, as well as a flattening yield curve, remain macro tailwinds. Strong fundamentals and macro tailwinds underscore the opportunity in the sector, especially given what remains a lower-than-average interest rate environment.
PGIM Fixed Income discusses implications from the latest developments in the global banking sector.
PGIM Real Estate provides perspectives on the turmoil in banking and what it means for real estate investing.
Alerian Midstream Energy Index is a broad-based composite of North American energy infrastructure companies and is a capped, float-adjusted, capitalization-weighted index whose constituents earn the majority of their cash flow from midstream activities involving energy commodities. Alerian MLP Index is the leading gauge of energy infrastructure Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) and is a capped, float-adjusted, capitalization-weighted index, whose constituents earn the majority of their cash flow from midstream activities involving energy commodities. S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 common stocks of large U.S. companies, weighted by market capitalization. It gives a broad look at how U.S. stock prices have performed. S&P 500 Financials Index comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 that are classified as members of the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) financials sector. S&P 500 Health Care Index comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 that are classified as members of the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) health care sector. S&P 500 Technology Index comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 that are classified as members of the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) technology sector. S&P 500 Utilities Index comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 that are classified as members of the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) utilities sector. Indices are unmanaged and an investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Risks—Investing involves risks. Some investments are riskier than others. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Foreign investments may be volatile and involve additional expenses and special risks, including currency fluctuations, foreign taxes, and political and economic uncertainties. Emerging and developing market investments may be especially volatile. Emerging markets are countries that are beginning to emerge with increased consumer potential driven by rapid industrial expansion and economic growth. Investing in emerging markets is very risky due to the additional political, economic, and currency risks associated with these underdeveloped geographic areas. Investments in securities of growth companies may be especially volatile. Due to the recent global economic crisis that caused financial difficulties for many European Union countries, eurozone investments may be subject to volatility and liquidity issues. Value investing involves the risk that undervalued securities may not appreciate as anticipated. It may take a substantial period of time to realize a gain on an investment in a small or midsized company, if any gain is realized at all. Diversification and asset allocation do not guarantee profit or protect against loss.
The views expressed herein are those of Jennison Associates at the time the comments were made and may not be reflective of their current opinions and are subject to change without notice. This commentary is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services. This commentary does not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. This commentary does not purport to provide any legal, tax, or accounting advice. PGIM Investments LLC is a registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain information in this commentary has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date presented; however, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of such information, assure its completeness, or warrant such information will not be changed. The information contained herein is current as of the date of issuance (or such earlier date as referenced herein) and is subject to change without notice. The manager has no obligation to update any or all such information, nor do we make any express or implied warranties or representations as to the completeness or accuracy. Any projections or forecasts presented herein are subject to change without notice. Actual data will vary and may not be reflected here. Projections and forecasts are subject to high levels of uncertainty. Accordingly, any projections or forecasts should be viewed as merely representative of a broad range of possible outcomes. Projections or forecasts are estimated, based on assumptions, subject to significant revision, and may change materially as economic and market conditions change.
This material is being provided for informational or educational purposes only and does not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any client or prospective clients. The information is not intended as investment advice and is not a recommendation. Clients seeking information regarding their particular investment needs should contact their financial professional.
Jennison Associates and PGIM, Inc. (PGIM) are registered investment advisors and Prudential Financial companies. PGIM Quantitative Solutions is the primary business name of PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of PGIM. PGIM Fixed Income and PGIM Real Estate are units of PGIM. © 2023 Prudential Financial, Inc. and its related entities. Jennison Associates, Jennison, PGIM Real Estate, PGIM, and the PGIM logo are service marks of Prudential Financial, Inc. and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.
1061283-00001-00
For compliance use only 1061283-00001-00