Skip to main content
PGIM LogoPGIM Logo
    • Megatrends
    • Annual Best Ideas
    • Quarterly Market Outlooks
    • Market Events
    • Thought Leadership
    • Events & Webinars
    • ESG Investing
    • Investing in Alternatives
    • Reaching for Yield
    • Clients We Serve
    • Defined Contribution
    • Institutional Relationships
    • Advisory Solutions
    • Global Locations
    • Contact Us
    • Overview
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Inclusion & Diversity
    • Global Locations
    • Jennison Associates
    • PGIM Fixed Income
    • PGIM Private Capital
    • PGIM Real Estate
    • QMA
    • PGIM Investments
    • PGIM Global Partners
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Request for Information
    • Careers at PGIM
    • Job Opportunities
    • All News
    • Press Releases
    • In the News
    • Facts & Figures
    • Media Contacts
PGIM homepage wave
Portfolio Performance & Markets

The Probability of Recession: A Critique of a New Forecasting TechniqueTheProbabilityofRecession:ACritiqueofaNewForecastingTechnique

By Dr. Noah Weisberger & Dr. Vishv Jeet — May 25, 2020

15 mins read

Share
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy URL
Download white paper

Share

A recent research publication by Kinlaw, Kritzman and Turkington (KKT)1 develops a new business cycle forecasting technique using a metric called “Mahalanobis distance.” This measure is intuitive, is based on a straightforward set of computations, is able to identify post-war US recession with few false positives, and has a reasonable forward hit rate.

In late 2019, KKT concluded that the probability of a US recession had climbed above 75%, a prediction that was at odds with many other models. But by early 2020, the probability of recession had retreated, falling below 3% (see Figure 1). The high degree of volatility prompted a need to learn more about the strengths and weaknesses of this new method. We also examine its potential as a market timing tool.

To facilitate a more detailed analysis, we replicate the KKT measure, which we label KKTIAS.

We have five observations on KKT:

(1) Mahalanobis distance and a Bayesian path to recession probability. KKT employs a statistic, the “Mahalanobis distance,” to the problem of business cycle forecasting. The idea underlying the Mahalanobis distance is that, at a point-in-time, a set of economic data can be described in terms of its “proximity” to, or “distance away” from, economic data that are typically observed during recessionary periods. This similarity score is essentially the likelihood that a given draw of data is from a recessionary distribution. The next step is to transform this likelihood into the probability of a recession given a draw of data, a far more relevant metric for market participants. As we make explicit, the Mahalanobis distance can be transformed into a recession probability. We are able to replicate KKT’s measure (to avoid confusion below we label our replication as KKTIAS) and show that it is very sensitive to the many technical details that go into the estimation of the parameters that govern the data’s distribution (namely the means and variance-covariance matrices).

(2) Which inputs matter? One drawback of the KTT methodology is that it does not lend itself to direct tests of statistical significance of the input variables the way, say, a regression model would allow. The KKT US recession probability measure is based on four input variables: US industrial production growth, US employment growth, trailing-twelve-month (TTM) equity returns and the yield curve. But the authors of the original paper do not discuss their choice of input variables, nor do they subject their index to any sensitivity analysis. We find that, historically, all four candidate explanatory variables do, in fact, seem to matter. We do not explore alternative specifications.

(3) Equity returns and the yield curve drive the 2019-2020 moves in recession probability. As illustrated in Figure 1, in late 2019 the KKTIAS index climbed 43 percentage points to 77%; it then subsequently fell to less than 3% by January 2020. In large part, market variables – S&P 500 returns and the yield curve – drove these sharp moves; the S&P 500, when taken alone, led to a 23ppt increase in the probability of recession (relative to a 43ppt decline for the full four-variable model) and the yield curve, when taken alone, led to an 8ppt increase (see Figure 2). Subsequently, the probability of recession fell by 74ppt (to a 3% probability of recession). Market variables were, again, dominant, with the S&P (taken alone) lowering the probability of recession by 43ppt, and the yield curve (alone) lowering the probability of recession by 10ppt (see Figure 3). Although employment growth on its own actually had little impact on the probability of recession, and industrial production actually led to a further increase in the probability of recession, when combined with market inputs (the yield curve and equity returns), the four variables, taken together, lowered the probability of recession by nearly 75ppt. This illustrates the importance of interaction effects among the input data series, one of the key strengths of the methodology, and underscores the importance in proper estimation of the VCV matrix which governs such interaction effects.

(4) Is an elevated probability of recession a risk-on signal for markets? Perhaps. From the perspective of an investment practitioner, one important potential use of a measure such as KKTIAS is as an indicator of forward market conditions, in terms of expected returns, volatility and risk considerations, and the implications for portfolio construction and allocation decisions. Given that trailing market data play a significant (though not exclusive) role in driving the KKTIAS measure, does KKTIAS provide forward market information? We analyze how an investor could use the KKTIAS index as a market timing signal. As Figure 4 illustrates, relative to times when KKTIAS climbs to 80% and higher, (we identify 13 such episodes using data from 1954 to present) average S&P 500 returns are negative in the 12-month window before such an event and are positive in the 12 months afterwards. This preliminary analysis suggests that a good deal of market damage has already been inflicted by the time KKTIAS climbs and warrants further exploration.

(5) Technical details: Estimating the variance-covariance matrix. From a technical/statistical perspective, the KKTIAS measure is sensitive to some choices in how to treat the data and estimate some of the key parameters. In particular, we focus on the role of the variance-covariance matrix (VCV) of the four input variables in calculating the probability of recession. We highlight three important facts in this context: (1) The role of the VCV matrix and its impact of weighting the input data is critical; when we try alternative specifications (using either a diagonal matrix – weighting by variances alone) or simple averaging of the data, the resulting probability measure changes substantially. (2) However, the estimated VCV is unstable over time. In particular, recessionary covariance terms do not seem to converge over time, with each recessionary period seemingly associated with its “own” set of covariances (among the four explanatory variables). (3) Finally, although market variables play an outsized role, there does seem to be a tendency for their variances to converge at a higher level, while macroeconomic variable variances seem to be converging to a lower level. This would make market variables relatively less important now relative to the past, and macroeconomic data relatively more important relative to the past (given that the weighting scheme is the inverse of the VCV matrix).

Download white paper
Learn More
Institutional Advisory & Solutions
The IAS team conducts bespoke, quantitative client research that focuses on asset allocation and portfolio analysis.

Learn More

  • By Dr. Noah WeisbergerManaging Director, Institutional Advisory & Solutions, PGIM
  • By Dr. Vishv JeetVice President, Institutional Advisory & Solutions, PGIM

More Insights from IAS

When the Dust Flies
Portfolio Performance & Markets

When the Dust Flies

Mar 23, 2020

Examining how volatility events and post-peak events, across a 68-year span, affect asset class performance.

What is the Optimal Number of Equity Managers?
Manager Allocation

What is the Optimal Number of Equity Managers?

Feb 3, 2020

Introducing the Manager Allocation Programming (MAP) tool to help CIOs efficiently combine managers of different strategies.

Forecasting Long-Term Equity Returns
Portfolio Performance & Markets

Forecasting Long-Term Equity Returns

Sep 3, 2018

Evaluating the out-of-sample historical performance of two common approaches, or methodologies, for estimating 10-year equity market returns.

  1. “A New Index of the Business Cycle” by W. Kinlaw, M. Kritzman and D. Turkington, MIT Sloan School Working Paper 5908- 20, 15 January 2020.
  • Insights

    • Megatrends

    • Annual Best Ideas

    • Quarterly Market Outlooks

    • Market Events

    • Thought Leadership

    • Events & Webinars

  • Investment Themes

    • ESG Investing

    • Investing in Alternatives

    • Reaching for Yield

  • Clients

    • Clients We Serve

    • Defined Contribution

    • Institutional Relationships

    • Advisory Solutions

  • About

    • Overview

    • Leadership

    • History

    • Inclusion & Diversity

    • Global Locations

    • Contact Us

    • Subscribe

    • Request for Information

  • Careers

    • Careers at PGIM

    • Job Opportunities

  • Newsroom

    • All News

    • Press Releases

    • In the News

    • Facts & Figures

    • Media Contacts

PGIM Logo
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Center
  • Accessibility Help
  • UK Regulatory Disclosures

Prudential Financial, Inc. and its related entities.

For Professional Investors only. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital.

It is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation in respect of any products or services to any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or residence. PGIM, Inc., is the principal asset management business of PFI and is a registered investment advisor with the US Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC). Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.  PGIM is a trading name of PGIM, Inc and its global subsidiaries.    

In the United Kingdom, information is issued by PGIM Limited with registered office: Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5HR. PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number 193418). In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), information is issued by PGIM Netherlands B.V. with registered office: Gustav Mahlerlaan 1212, 1081 LA  Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PGIM Netherlands B.V. is, authorised by the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”) in the Netherlands (Registration number 15003620) and operating on the basis of a European passport. In certain EEA countries, information is, where permitted, presented by PGIM Limited in reliance of provisions, exemptions or licenses available to PGIM Limited under temporary permission arrangements following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. These materials are issued by PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. to persons who are professional clients as defined  under the rules of the FCA and/or to persons who are professional clients as defined in the relevant local implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II).  

In Japan, investment management services are made available by PGIM Japan, Co. Ltd., ("PGIM Japan"), a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator with the Financial Services Agency of Japan. In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 (paragraph (a) to (i) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571). In Singapore, information is issued by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“PGIM Singapore”), a Singapore investment manager that is licensed as a capital markets service license holder by the Monetary Authority of Singapore and an exempt financial adviser. These materials are issued by PGIM Singapore for the general information of “institutional investors” pursuant to Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”) and “accredited investors” and other relevant persons in accordance with the conditions specified in Sections 305 of the SFA. In South Korea, information is issued by PGIM, Inc., which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean qualified institutional investors on a cross-border basis.    

Prudential Financial, Inc. of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. PGIM, the PGIM logo and Rock design are service marks of PFI and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.  The information on this website is not intended as investment advice and is not a recommendation about managing or investing your retirement savings. In making the information available on this website, PGIM, Inc. and its affiliates are not acting as your fiduciary.    

©2021 PFI and its related entities.