Skip to main content
PGIM LogoPGIM Logo
    • Megatrends
    • Annual Best Ideas
    • Quarterly Market Outlooks
    • Market Events
    • Thought Leadership
    • Events & Webinars
    • ESG Investing
    • Investing in Alternatives
    • Opportunities in EM
    • Risk Management
    • Clients We Serve
    • Defined Contribution
    • Financial Advisors
    • Institutional Relationships
    • Institutional Advisory & Solutions
    • Global Locations
    • Contact Us
    • Overview
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Global Locations
    • Jennison Associates
    • PGIM Fixed Income
    • PGIM Private Capital
    • PGIM Real Estate
    • PGIM Quantitative Solutions
    • PGIM Portfolio Advisory
    • PGIM Investments
    • Montana Capital Partners
    • PGIM DC Solutions
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Request for Information
    • Careers at PGIM
    • Job Opportunities
    • All News
    • Press Releases
    • In the News
    • Facts & Figures
    • Media Contacts
architecture
Manager Allocation & Selection

What is the Optimal Number of Equity Managers?WhatistheOptimalNumberofEquityManagers?

By Wenbo Zhang — Feb 3, 2020

15 mins

Share
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy URL
Download white paper

Share

A CIO Toolkit for Manager Allocation

Many institutional investors have adopted a multi-manager structure to harvest alpha from various sources efficiently with diversified active risk. However, CIOs must decide the number of managers to hire and the corresponding allocation across different kinds of managers and strategies.

Recent research challenges traditional multi-manger portfolio construction by showing that a combination of randomly picked active managers will lead to a portfolio where generic ideas (e.g., market and other systematic risk factors) dominate the portfolio’s risk budget while exposure to uncorrelated idiosyncratic and manager-specific ideas shrinks. The diversification benefit vanishes when correlations among generic ideas increase during periods of significant market declines.

How can a CIO efficiently combine managers of different strategies to construct a diversified portfolio while limiting the danger of overdiversification? We develop a manager allocation methodology to solve the problem of achieving an efficient trade-off between portfolio active risk and return. The methodology solves for the optimal number of managers that balances the diversification benefit and cost.

We focus on US large-cap equity investment mandates and identify three persistent manager attributes: style, investment approach and active risk level (Figure 1). Manager characteristics over these three dimensions identify distinct investment philosophies and strategies, thereby partitioning the manager universe. Based on this classification, we develop an allocation tool, Manager Allocation Programming (MAP), to help CIOs make manager allocation decisions. MAP guides CIOs to optimally allocate capital across managers while also incorporating their preferences for different manager characteristics.

We decompose the problem of finding the optimal number of managers into two parts: First, given a total number of managers, what is the set of possible manager allocations, from the universe of managers, that best fits a CIO’s preferences (Figure 2)? This question is addressed by MAP. Then, what is that total number of managers achieving the best risk-adjusted active performance? We use simulation to determine the optimal number of managers to hire, given the CIO’s cost function, manager preferences and manager selection skill.

We discuss an example where the CIO has Neutral preferences (i.e., no explicit preference to any manager type and comfortable with a portfolio balanced across various manager characteristics) and compare this MAP solution with Core-only allocation (i.e., selecting managers only from the core group). We also analyze the solutions for CIOs of Risk-seeking preferences.

Figure 3 summarizes the results. The MAP allocation method dominates Core-only, regardless of the CIO’s manager selection skill level. MAP allocates across managers while maintaining portfolio net exposure close to, if not exactly, neutral over all three dimensions. While the portfolio tracking error volatility rises moderately by 0.3% - 0.5% annually, the portfolio IR is always better. This result implies that MAP solutions guide CIOs to allocate across managers more efficiently and take on more “good” volatility. Compared to the Core-only allocation, MAP solutions optimize risk allocations and therefore drive up both annual IR and net alpha, by 0.05 – 0.15 and 20 – 30bp/y, respectively, in the case of “No Skill”, depending on the total number of managers.

Considering both the net alpha and information ratio, all else equal, we find that a CIO with Neutral preferences and following MAP allocations benefits from an increasing number of managers as their manager selection skill improves: 3-4 managers assuming no skill and 8-9 managers assuming moderate to strong skill.

To address the concern of low risk illusion, we examine how MAP allocations perform during stressful market environments. The MAP method, though not immune from the problem of correlation spikes, improves the portfolio’s performance in high volatility regimes from its more effective manager diversification compared to the alternative Core-only method in the example of Neutral preferences.

We also incorporate passive strategies into the discussion. We consider combination of passive strategies with active MAP solutions to meet a CIO’s overall portfolio active risk budget.

In summary, we approach portfolio construction from a diversification perspective instead of using traditional mean-variance optimization. We build a CIO toolkit, taking into consideration a CIO’s specific preferences, ability to distinguish outperforming managers from peers, and their cost of implementing such a multi-manager portfolio.

Download white paper
Learn More
Institutional Advisory & Solutions

The IAS team conducts bespoke, quantitative client research that focuses on asset allocation and portfolio analysis.

Learn More

  • By Wenbo ZhangSenior Associate, PGIM Quantitative Solutions

More insights from IAS

Equity Portfolio Manager Active Risk and Information Ratio
Manager Allocation & Selection

Equity Portfolio Manager Active Risk and Information Ratio

Nov 25, 2020

Do high active risk equity portfolio managers realize a higher (or lower) IR compared to low active risk managers?

Measuring the Value of LP Fund-Selection Skill: A Fair Comparison Framework
Manager Allocation & Selection

Measuring the Value of LP Fund-Selection Skill: A Fair Comparison Framework

Apr 6, 2020

Using the IAS fair comparison framework, this publication explores the impact of choices an investor in private markets must make.

Anchor to Windward: Aligning Absolute Return Objectives
Manager Allocation & Selection

Anchor to Windward: Aligning Absolute Return Objectives

Apr 23, 2018

The Anchor ratio helps identify absolute return strategies and funds with more consistent and sustained performance.

  • Insights

    • Megatrends
    • Annual Best Ideas
    • Quarterly Market Outlooks
    • Market Events
    • Thought Leadership
    • Events & Webinars
  • Investment Themes

    • ESG Investing
    • Investing in Alternatives
    • Investing in Emerging Markets
  • Clients

    • Clients We Serve
    • Defined Contribution
    • Financial Advisors
    • Institutional Relationships
    • Advisory Solutions
  • About

    • Overview
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Global Locations
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Request for Information
  • Careers

    • Careers at PGIM
    • Job Opportunities
  • Newsroom

    • All News
    • Press Releases
    • In The News
    • Facts & Figures
    • Media Contacts
PGIM Logo
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Center
  • Accessibility Help
  • UK Regulatory Disclosures
  • Netherlands Regulatory Disclosures
  • Cookie Preference Center

For Professional Investors only. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital.

This material is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation in respect of any products or services to any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or residence. PGIM is the principal asset management business of Prudential Financial, Inc. and a trading name of PGIM, Inc. and its global subsidiaries. PGIM, Inc. is a registered investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

The information on this website is not intended as investment advice and is not a recommendation about managing or investing your retirement savings. In making the information available on this website, PGIM, Inc. and its affiliates are not acting as your fiduciary.    

In the United Kingdom, information is issued by PGIM Limited with registered office: Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5HR. PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number 193418). In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), information is issued by PGIM Netherlands B.V. with registered office: Gustav Mahlerlaan 1212, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PGIM Netherlands B.V. is, authorised by the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”) in the Netherlands (Registration number 15003620) and operating on the basis of a European passport. In certain EEA countries, information is, where permitted, presented by PGIM Limited in reliance of provisions, exemptions or licenses available to PGIM Limited under temporary permission arrangements following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. These materials are issued by PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. to persons who are professional clients as defined under the rules of the FCA and/or to persons who are professional clients as defined in the relevant local implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). In Italy, information is provided by PGIM Limited authorized to operate in Italy by Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB). 

In Japan, information is provided by PGIM Japan Co., Ltd. (“PGIM Japan”) and/or PGIM Real Estate (Japan) Ltd. (“PGIMREJ”).  PGIM Japan, a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator with the Financial Services Agency of Japan offers various investment management services in Japan.  PGIMREJ is a Japanese real estate asset manager that is registered with the Kanto Local Finance Bureau of Japan.

In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571). In Singapore, information is issued by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“PGIM Singapore”), a regulated entity with the Monetary Authority of Singapore under a Capital Markets Services License to conduct fund management and an exempt financial adviser. This material is issued by PGIM Singapore for the general information of “institutional investors” pursuant to Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act 2001 of Singapore (the “SFA”) and “accredited investors” and other relevant persons in accordance with the conditions specified in Section 305 of the SFA. In South Korea, information is issued by PGIM, Inc., which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean qualified institutional investors on a cross-border basis.   

Prudential Financial, Inc. (“PFI”) of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. 

You are viewing this page in preview mode.

Edit Page