You are currently in our Borrower site.
You are visiting our Borrower site, but you are attested as an Institutional Investor.
You are visiting our Borrower site, but you are attested as a Financial Advisor / Intermediary.
You are visiting our Borrower site, but you are attested as a Borrower.
You are visiting our Borrower site, but you are attested as an Individual Investor.
Over the past decade, asset owners have significantly increased their contributions to passive equity investments, which often help frame the overall policy benchmark for their equity allocation. This move reflects a growing preference to capture broad market exposures in a cost-effective manner. With an increased focus on ESG, asset owners are faced with the difficult challenge of deciding how to evolve their investments in traditional broad market indices to better capture the goal of improving their ESG portfolio profile. Over the last year, there has been a 40% increase in the number of ESG indexes for investors to choose from.1 Index providers and asset managers have constructed ever-more sophisticated solutions to try to meet the rapidly evolving investor demand for sustainable solutions. To this end, ESG indexing strategies are a popular choice, but we believe they may be a suboptimal solution for asset owners — from both an investment performance and a sustainability perspective.
PGIMはお客様からの信頼を大切にし、プライバシーを尊重しています。当社は、お客様の利便性を向上させるためにクッキーを使用しています。クッキー設定の管理や、当社による情報保護の取り組みについての詳細は、PGIMプライバシーセンターでご確認いただけます。
*This website uses cookies
PGIMはお客様からの信頼を大切にし、プライバシーを尊重しています。当社は、お客様の利便性を向上させるためにクッキーを使用しています。クッキー設定の管理や、当社による情報保護の取り組みについての詳細は、PGIMプライバシーセンターでご確認いただけます。
This field is required.
Loading terms...
Terms and Conditions could not be loaded. Please contact your system administrator.