The EU has good reason to consider action. China’s trade surplus with the EU reached €360.6 billion in 2025, according to figures cited by the European Commission, before widening by a further 9% during the first half of 2026. 1
Rising Chinese imports have coincided with falling EU exports, with the effects particularly pronounced in the parts of European industry most exposed to Chinese competition.
Percent of National GDP
Source: Eurostat, as of 6 August 2026
China’s export basket has become increasingly similar to Europe’s, meaning companies from both markets now compete more directly across machinery, metals, chemicals and motor vehicles.
Rather than pursuing a sweeping “Liberation Day” approach, Brussels is more likely to rely on safeguards, anti-dumping investigations and emerging trade instruments targeted at particular sectors.
The most likely outcome is managed competition, with selective pressure from the EU met by limited and largely reactive measures from China. A targeted dispute remains the principal downside scenario, while a broad rupture is still a tail risk.
The aggregate economic effect may remain modest, but the impact could be more pronounced at a sector and company level. Investors should therefore look beyond headline tariffs and consider exposure to Chinese inputs, pricing power, inventory buffers and access to alternative suppliers.
The central issue is not that Europe and China are decoupling. It is that the cost of their interdependence is rising, unevenly and one sector at a time.
1 Thomson Reuters, EU wants initial Chinese action on trade gap by early October, as of 22 September.
詳しくはこちら
詳しくはこちら
詳しくはこちら