Recent passage of the GENIUS Act has accelerated the adoption of U.S. dollar stablecoins. If widely accepted, U.S. dollar tokens could fundamentally impact emerging markets’ payment systems and monetary policies. Stablecoin adoption carries potential benefits, such as cheaper international payments and greater remittance transfers. However, it could also make EM local financial conditions more dependent on the U.S. dollar and U.S. short-term rates, reversing years of effort to boost monetary policy independence and local market depth. Increased demand for U.S. dollar-denominated assets could also weaken monetary policy transmission from EM central banks and bank intermediation, thereby putting downward pressure on capital flows. So, while we do see efficiency gains from the spread of U.S. dollar-linked stablecoins in the least developed markets, the risks for more developed EM economies are quite significant.
One positive impact is that emerging markets—particularly the least developed ones—could benefit from cheaper international payments and greater remittance inflows. Of the US$818 billion global remittance flows in 2023, US$656 billion went to low- and medium-income countries in what is a notoriously inefficient system (Fig 1). The cost of sending US$200 (a typical remittance transaction size) averages 6.5%, while some corridors, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, average nearly 9%. Cutting transaction fees by 5% could save up to US$16 billion per year, according to the World Bank. The use of stablecoins has increased in recent years, with the average supply of stablecoins in circulation increasing by 28% in each of the past two years (Fig 2).
Remittance Inflows by Region to Low- and Middle-Income Countries
By compressing end-to-end costs and settlement times, increased use has the potential to be an impactful source of savings. Lower transaction inefficiencies may also encourage more frequent inflows.1 This means more disposable income to support consumption and real economic activity—especially if the country is less developed and more reliant on remittances.
Average Supply of Stablecoins in Circulation
If the destination country has a developed payment system, locals would likely convert stablecoins into the domestic currency. In a less sophisticated domestic banking and regulatory system, stablecoins may start to replace the local currency as more foreign inflows are “trapped” as stablecoins or are adopted as a parallel system to the domestic architecture.
Although remittance efficiencies would likely increase inflows, currency substitution could reduce overall demand for local currency. For example, friction stemming from dated or underinvested local banking infrastructure could discourage conversion (Fig 3). If remittances denominated in stablecoin are not converted into local currency, weaker demand would weigh on the exchange rate. Persistent depreciation could have an inflationary effect or further undermine confidence in local currencies, necessitating tighter monetary policy or FX intervention to stabilize the currency.
Stylised Matrix of Stablecoin Adoption Likelihood
Broad-based substitution into U.S. dollar-denominated token resembles dollarization, however, and could undermine the independence of monetary policy. Inflation spikes or doubts about policy credibility may drive residents to adopt stablecoins as a medium of exchange and store of value, bypassing banks and traditional substitutes such as FX or gold. This would shift a growing share of money outside of central bank control, making inflation harder to manage and requiring higher policy rates in adverse conditions. Such dynamics risk a vicious cycle of currency substitution and ineffective policy that are similar to past experiences in Türkiye or Argentina.
Broader stablecoin use could also make monetary conditions more procyclical. While legislation bans interest on U.S stablecoins, some offer indirect incentives, and there are tokenized T-bill funds which issue shares that retail holders can trade using blockchain technology.2 Easy conversion from local currency into these instruments could make the front-end of the U.S. yield curve a competitor to local deposits, forcing EM central banks to maintain positive real rate differentials versus the Fed. If U.S. front-end yields rise, narrowing differentials could make stablecoins attractive during stress, amplifying outflows from the local currency and undermining accommodative policy when it would be needed most.
Lower demand for local currency also risks bank disintermediation and tighter credit. Depositors shifting to stablecoins represent de facto capital outflows and liquidity drains. Of course, this depends on the degree of sophistication of retail customers and the banking infrastructure. Credit would tighten as money velocity slows and its multiplier falls. Banks may raise deposit rates to retain customers, increasing their funding costs. Marginal lending would probably fall, and local currency credit would tighten further. Shallower local markets due to disintermediation would also hurt domestic investment and government financing.
Conversion into stablecoins constitutes capital outflows, requiring adjustment via narrower current accounts, reserve drawdowns, or external borrowing. Financing deficits becomes harder as outflows divert domestic funding and investment out of the economy. Therefore, authorities may resort to higher policy rates, costly external financing, FX reserve use, or fiscal tightening to close gaps.
Stablecoin holdings may also lack deposit insurance. Although the GENIUS Act mandates 1:1 reserve backing, parallels with the 19th-century Free Banking era warrant caution.3 Despite more sophisticated regulation today, token proliferation could expose non-U.S. holders to fraud or mismanagement. A run on issuers could inflict losses on EM residents heavily invested in stablecoins while a mass exit could trigger rapid local currency appreciation.4 Both the loss of wealth and heightened exchange rate volatility stemming from uncertainty around new stablecoin issuers would dampen aggregate demand.
Given the considerations above, implications for central bank reserves are context dependent. If residents already access dollar-denominated stablecoins, reserve managers may feel less need to hold large U.S. dollar buffers for FX stability, prompting diversification into other assets, such as gold or RMB for strategic reasons. Conversely, widespread adoption of U.S. Treasury-backed stablecoins (especially where conversion back to local currency is difficult) could reinforce dollar dominance and make Treasuries even more central to reserve management. In this case, growing liquid U.S. dollar allocations would complement efforts to maintain currency stability.
As central banks respond to stablecoin proliferation, investors should stay alert to evolving regulatory, monetary, and economic policies in emerging markets. Economic instability, high inflation, and low-cost remittances will increase stablecoin appeal among residents. This shift poses challenges for central banks, including FX volatility, risk of capital flight, and shallower local markets. Policy rates may rise to maintain credibility and widen differentials with the Fed. Central banks must therefore remain committed to transparent and credible monetary policymaking. If managed effectively, local rates could converge toward Fed levels, creating opportunities in local markets.
Credit and local investors should therefore be aware of how stablecoin adoption and subsequent policy responses affect assumptions on monetary policy assertiveness, fiscal capacity, FX pressures, reserve drawdowns, and financing costs.
1 A stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency engineered to maintain a stable price by pegging its value to a real-world asset, such as the U.S. dollar or gold.
2 Wired, “The Loophole Turning Stablecoins into a Trillion-Dollar Fight,” September 3, 2025.
3 Gary B. Gorton & Jeffrey Y. Zhang, Taming Wildcat Stablecoins, University of Chicago Law Review (2023)
4 BIS Annual Economic Report, “The Next-Generation Monetary and Financial System,” June 24, 2025.
Source(s) of data (unless otherwise noted): PGIM Fixed Income, as of December 2025.
For Professional Investors only. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital.
PGIM Fixed Income is a global asset manager primarily focused on public fixed income investments whose U.S. business operates as a unit of PGIM, Inc. PGIM, Inc. is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and is a Prudential Financial, Inc. (“PFI”) company. Registration with the SEC as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level or skill or training. PGIM Fixed Income is headquartered in Newark, New Jersey and also includes the following businesses globally: (i) the public fixed income unit within PGIM Limited, located in London; (ii) locally managed assets of PGIM Japan Co., Ltd., located in Tokyo; (iii) the public fixed income unit within PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., located in Singapore; and (iv) the public fixed income unit within PGIM Netherlands B.V., located in Amsterdam. PFI of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. Prudential, PGIM, their respective logos and the Rock symbol are service marks of PFI and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.
These materials are for informational or educational purposes. The information is not intended as investment advice and is not a recommendation about managing or investing assets. In providing these materials, PGIM Fixed Income is not acting as your fiduciary. Clients seeking information regarding their particular investment needs should contact their financial professional.
This document may contain confidential information and the recipient hereof agrees to maintain the confidentiality of such information. Distribution of this information to any person other than the person to whom it was originally delivered and to such person’s advisers is unauthorized, and any reproduction of this document, in whole or in part, or the divulgence of any of its contents, without PGIM Fixed Income’s prior written consent, is prohibited. This document contains the current opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change. Certain information in this document has been obtained from sources that PGIM Fixed Income believes to be reliable as of the date presented; however, PGIM Fixed Income cannot guarantee the accuracy of such information, assure its completeness, or warrant such information will not be changed. The information contained herein is current as of the date of issuance (or such earlier date as referenced herein) and is subject to change without notice. PGIM Fixed Income has no obligation to update any or all such information; nor do we make any express or implied warranties or representations as to its completeness or accuracy. Any information presented regarding the affiliates of PGIM Fixed Income is presented purely to facilitate an organizational overview and is not a solicitation on behalf of any affiliate.
These materials are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services. These materials do not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision.
This material may contain examples of the firm’s internal ESG research program and is not intended to represent any particular product’s or strategy’s performance or how any particular product or strategy will be invested or allocated at any particular time. PGIM’s ESG policies and procedures, rankings and factors may change over time, in PGIM Fixed Income’s discretion. ESG investing is qualitative and subjective by nature; there is no guarantee that the criteria used or judgment exercised by PGIM Fixed Income will reflect the beliefs or values of any investor. Information regarding certain ESG practices may be obtained through third-party reporting, which may not be accurate or complete, and PGIM Fixed Income depends on this information to evaluate a company’s commitment to, or implementation of, ESG practices. ESG norms differ by region. Accounts managed by PGIM Fixed Income may or may not hold instruments issued by any of the issuers that may be discussed herein. Nothing contained herein should be construed as limiting the investments or strategies that PGIM Fixed Income can pursue when managing a client account. There is no assurance that PGIM Fixed Income’s ESG investing techniques will be successful.
These materials do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives or needs. No determination has been made regarding the suitability of any securities, financial instruments or strategies for particular clients or prospects. The information contained herein is provided on the basis and subject to the explanations, caveats and warnings set out in this notice and elsewhere herein. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe PGIM Fixed Income’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk. No risk management technique can guarantee the mitigation or elimination of risk in any market environment. Any risk metrics or portfolio characteristics provided are not, and should not be construed as, the past or projected performance of the strategy presented or any investment, which will be impacted by a number of factors not reflected herein. These materials do not purport to provide any legal, tax or accounting advice. These materials are not intended for distribution to or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation.
Any financial indices referenced herein as benchmarks are provided for informational purposes only. The use of benchmarks has limitations because portfolio holdings and characteristics will differ from those of the benchmark(s), and such differences may be material. You cannot make a direct investment in an index. Factors affecting portfolio performance that do not affect benchmark performance may include portfolio rebalancing, the timing of cash flows, credit quality, diversification, and differences in volatility. In addition, financial indices do not reflect the impact of fees, applicable taxes or trading costs which reduce returns. Unless otherwise noted, financial indices assume reinvestment of dividends.
Any forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be interpreted as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation, nor as the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and unlike an actual performance record, do not reflect actual trading, liquidity constraints, fee. These materials are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliates may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views expressed herein, including for proprietary accounts of PGIM Fixed Income or its affiliates.
Any performance targets contained herein are subject to revision by PGIM Fixed Income and are provided solely as a guide to current expectations. There can be no assurance that any product or strategy described herein will achieve any targets or that there will be any return of capital. Target annualized excess returns are presented on both a gross and net basis solely for the purpose of detailing the anticipated risk and reward characteristics of the strategy in order to facilitate comparisons with other investment types. Gross targets do not reflect the deduction of fees and other expenses to be borne by accounts using the strategy, which will reduce returns and, in the aggregate, may be substantial. Net targets reflect the deduction of model fees and expenses equal to the highest fees borne by a portfolio utilizing the strategy. The target returns presented herein are not a prediction, projection, expectation or guarantee of future performance. There are significant risks and limitations in using target returns, including targets that are based upon assumptions regarding future events and situations, which may prove not to be accurate or may not materialize. Further, the target returns stated herein are based on an assumption that economic, market and other conditions will not deteriorate and, in some cases, will improve. The target returns are also based on models, estimates and assumptions about performance believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, but actual returns of the strategy and its investments will depend on, among other factors, the ability to consummate attractive investments, future operating results, the value of the assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs and the timing and manner of sale, all of which may differ from the assumptions and circumstances on which the targeted returns are based. PGIM Fixed Income believes that the target returns for the strategy and each investment type reflect in part a measure of the risk PGIM Fixed Income will be taking with respect to the strategy and investments in that investment type. There can be no assurance that any investments, any of the investment types or the strategy will achieve comparable returns to those targeted herein or that PGIM Fixed Income will be able to implement its investment strategy and investment approach or achieve its investment objectives. Target returns do not take into account cash flows into and out of the portfolio, as well as other factors, which could have an impact on actual performance of a client utilizing the strategy. Accordingly, target returns should not be used as a primary basis for an investor's decision to invest in the strategy.
Tracking Error (TE) is one possible measurement of the dispersion of a portfolio's returns from its stated benchmark; it is the standard deviation of such excess returns. TE figures are representations of statistical expectations falling within "normal" distributions of return patterns. Normal statistical distributions of returns suggests that approximately two thirds of the time the annual gross returns of the accounts will lie in a range equal to the benchmark return plus or minus the TE if the market behaves in a manner suggested by historical returns. Targeted TE therefore applies statistical probabilities (and the language of uncertainty) and so cannot be predictive of actual results. In addition, past tracking error is not indicative of future TE and there can be no assurance that the TE actually reflected in your accounts will be at levels either specified in the investment objectives or suggested by our forecasts.
In the United Kingdom, information is issued by PGIM Limited with registered office: Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5HR.PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number 193418). In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), information is issued by PGIM Netherlands B.V., an entity authorised by the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”) in the Netherlands and operating on the basis of a European passport. In certain EEA countries, information is, where permitted, presented by PGIM Limited in reliance of provisions, exemptions or licenses available to PGIM Limited including those available under temporary permission arrangements following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. These materials are issued by PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. to persons who are professional clients as defined under the rules of the FCA and/or to persons who are professional clients as defined in the relevant local implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). In Switzerland, information is issued by PGIM Limited, London, through its Representative Office in Zurich with registered office: Kappelergasse 14, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland. PGIM Limited, London, Representative Office in Zurich is authorised and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA and these materials are issued to persons who are professional or institutional clients within the meaning of Art.4 para 3 and 4 FinSA in Switzerland. In certain countries in Asia-Pacific, information is presented by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., a regulated entity with the Monetary Authority of Singapore under a Capital Markets Services License to conduct fund management and an exempt financial adviser. In Japan, information is presented by PGIM Japan Co. Ltd., registered investment adviser with the Japanese Financial Services Agency. In South Korea, information is presented by PGIM, Inc., which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean investors. In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571). In Australia, information is issued by PGIM (Australia) Pty Ltd (“PGIM Australia”) for the general information of its wholesale clients (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001). PGIM Australia is an Australian financial services ("AFS") licence holder (AFS licence number 544946). In Canada, pursuant to the international adviser registration exemption in National Instrument 31-103, PGIM, Inc. is informing you that: (1) PGIM, Inc. is not registered in Canada and is advising you in reliance upon an exemption from the adviser registration requirement under National Instrument 31-103; (2) PGIM, Inc.’s jurisdiction of residence is New Jersey, U.S.A.; (3) there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against PGIM, Inc. because it is resident outside of Canada and all or substantially all of its assets may be situated outside of Canada; and (4) the name and address of the agent for service of process of PGIM, Inc. in the applicable Provinces of Canada are as follows: in Québec: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 1000 de La Gauchetière Street West, Suite 900 Montréal, QC H3B 5H4; in British Columbia: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 1200 Waterfront Centre, 200 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V7X 1T2; in Ontario: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3400, Toronto, ON M5H 4E3; in Nova Scotia: Cox & Palmer, Q.C., 1100 Purdy’s Wharf Tower One, 1959 Upper Water Street, P.O. Box 2380 -Stn Central RPO, Halifax, NS B3J 3E5; in Alberta: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 530 Third Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P R3.
© 2025 PFI and its related entities.
2025-10025
Collapse Section