Skip to main content
PGIM LogoPGIM Logo
    • Megatrends
    • Annual Best Ideas
    • OutFront Series
    • Quarterly Market Outlooks
    • Vantage Point Series
    • Market Events
    • Thought Leadership
    • Events & Webinars
    • Video Library
    • Podcasts
    • Investing in Alternatives
    • Risk Management
    • ESG Investing
    • Opportunities in EM
  • Alternatives

    • PGIM Private Alternatives
    • PGIM Private Capital
    • PGIM Real Estate
    • Montana Capital Partners (PE)

    Equity & Fixed Income

    • PGIM Fixed Income
    • Jennison Associates

    Solutions

    • PGIM DC Solutions
    • PGIM Multi-Asset Solutions
    • PGIM Quantitative Solutions

    Intermediary Distribution

    • PGIM Investments
    • Clients We Serve
    • Defined Contribution
    • Financial Advisors
    • Institutional Relationships
    • Global Locations
    • Contact Us
    • Overview
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Our Businesses
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Global Locations
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Request for Information
    • Careers at PGIM
    • Job Opportunities
    • All News
    • Press Releases
    • In the News
    • Facts & Figures
    • Media Contacts
rebalancing
Portfolio Research

The Rebalancing Conundrum: PE valuations & Market DislocationsTheRebalancingConundrum:PEvaluations&MarketDislocations

By Junying Shen & Dr. Michelle (Yu) Teng — Feb 28, 2022

5 mins

Share
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy URL
Download PDF

Share

Private assets have had phenomenal returns over the past decade.  Global buyout funds delivered a stunning 21.9%/y return for the last 3y and 16.2%/y for the last 10y. In contrast, in the public space, the S&P 500 had a considerably lower 12.4%/y 10y annualized return.  Not surprisingly, institutional investors have increased their portfolio allocations to private equity (PE) considering its higher returns and diversification potential that public assets may not be able to match.  Over the past decade, PE buyout funds AUM has grown 7% compounded annually.

With PE’s strong performance, CIOs may be facing the rebalancing conundrum: if and how to rebalance PE back to target allocation and whether there is sufficient liquidity to do so.

The rebalancing conundrum becomes acute during periods of public market dislocation when public asset performance declines sharply relative to PE leading to an over-weight – “on paper” – to PE, a phenomenon commonly known as the “denominator effect.” Many CIOs find their PE allocations rise far above target allocations.   

Getting back to target allocation during periods of market turmoil may require CIOs to sell PE investments. However, this could be expensive during market dislocations when PE is likely to be priced at a discount in secondary markets. Such periods may be attractive for buying, not selling, PE. In addition, efforts to rebalance between PE and public assets may prove unnecessary as public market declines are often reversed quickly. Finally, PE secondary market opportunities may be limited when public markets recover, posing a challenge to CIOs who would then want to buy PE to maintain allocation. Perhaps a more sensible rebalancing strategy design is to gradually rebalance the portfolio without actively trading PE.

Source: Datastream, FRB St. Louis (FRED) and PGIM IAS.

A key contributor to the rebalancing conundrum is the difficulty of PE valuation. One valuation approach relies on GP-supplied reported NAVs, reflecting the GP’s informed judgment on the value of portfolio assets which may be insensitive to the ups and downs experienced in the public markets. Another approach makes PE values very sensitive to public market returns, reflecting skepticism of reported PE values as the PE’s “true” value. For CIOs, the challenge remains as to how to strike the appropriate degree of sensitivity.

Since portfolio rebalancing decisions hinge on PE valuation, we explore three PE valuation approaches with different implied sensitivities to contemporaneous public market returns. The first two approaches – with low and moderate sensitivity to public market returns – can incorporate commitment history and pacing strategy, thus connecting a PE investment’s valuation with its cash flow profile (distributions and contributions) from which liquidity implications of a portfolio’s PE allocation can be measured. A third approach strictly ties PE valuation change to contemporaneous periodic public returns but lacks a connectivity to PE cash flows.

We assess the portfolio allocation implications for the two PE valuation approaches with high and low sensitivity to the public market returns in the context of a stressed public market scenario with a fast and sharp rebound. Following the most market-sensitive PE valuation approach, both public equity and PE allocations drop below target (while debt rises above target), requiring buying both public equity and PE to get back to target – which may be attractive when the market is down. In contrast, with the less market-sensitive PE valuation approach, the PE allocation rises above, and public equity drops below, target requiring selling PE into a weak market.

The choice of PE valuation approach may also rest on the investor type, their objective of investing in private assets and their liquidity constraints. For a defined contribution plan vulnerable to daily withdrawals, a public market downturn could motivate immediate participant withdrawal requests. A lagged PE performance update may benefit some “first-mover” participants over those who remain. These plans may have little choice but to use a market-sensitive PE valuation approach – but at least it may give the remaining participants (now holding more than their pro rata share of PE) an opportunity to gain a potential counter-cyclical PE trading advantage as compensation for providing liquidity for those who withdraw.

CIOs can consider grouping PE and public equity together as a single “growth asset” and rebalancing between debt and the growth asset.

In contrast, defined benefit plans and sovereign funds do not have to worry much about withdrawals and may be more comfortable using reported (i.e., less market sensitive) valuations. However, to avoid costly PE rebalancing, these CIOs may wish to consider a rebalancing strategy that groups PE and public equity together as a single “growth asset,” since public and private equity share similar risk exposures and investors commonly pass any PE net cash outflows through public equity. In this case, portfolio rebalancing involves rebalancing between debt and this growth asset. Following this strategy, overall debt-growth asset allocation target is achieved, even if public equity and PE do not align within their own respective target.

Download PDF

Full Research

The Rebalancing Conundrum: Private Equity Valuations and Market Dislocations

We show how portfolio rebalancing hinges on the PE valuation approach. CIOs need to understand this connection and how it affects their portfolio’s liquidity.

Learn more
Media Contacts

Julia O'Brien
Alexis Tosti

Learn More
Portfolio Research

The Portfolio Research team conducts proprietary research, helping investors navigate asset allocation, portfolio construction, and evolving market landscapes.

Learn More

  • By Junying ShenPrincipal, PGIM
  • By Dr. Michelle (Yu) TengVice President, PGIM

You may also like

Slower Private Asset Distributions: What Does It Mean for a CIO?
Illiquid Private Assets

Slower Private Asset Distributions: What Does It Mean for a CIO?

Jan 15, 2025

Since 2022, private asset distributions have weakened. Understand how this impacts CIO’s commitment pacing, liquidity risk and asset allocations.

Collective Defined Contribution (CDC) Schemes: Assessing Capacity for Alternative Investments
Illiquid Private Assets

Collective Defined Contribution (CDC) Schemes: Assessing Capacity for Alternative Investments

Jul 31, 2024

There is growing interest in collective defined contribution schemes as pension systems adapt to changing economics and demographics.

Uncovering the Unobservable: Have Private Assets Outperformed Public Assets?
Portfolio Research

Uncovering the Unobservable: Have Private Assets Outperformed Public Assets?

Jul 14, 2024

IAS's Fair Comparison framework uncovers the real-world performance of private assets, comparing private and public assets on a consistent risk-adjusted basis.

  • Insights

    • Megatrends
    • Annual Best Ideas
    • OutFront Series
    • Quarterly Market Outlooks
    • Market Events
    • Thought Leadership
    • Events & Webinars
    • Video Library
    • Podcasts
  • Investment Themes

    • ESG Investing
    • Investing in Alternatives
    • Investing in Emerging Markets
    • Risk Management
  • Our Businesses

    • PGIM DC Solutions
    • PGIM Fixed Income
    • PGIM Investments
    • PGIM Multi-Asset Solutions
    • PGIM Private Alternatives
    • PGIM Private Capital
    • PGIM Real Estate
    • Montana Capital Partners (PE)
    • PGIM Quantitative Solutions
    • Jennison Associates
  • Clients

    • Clients We Serve
    • Defined Contribution
    • Financial Advisors
    • Institutional Relationships
  • About

    • Overview
    • Leadership
    • History
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Global Locations
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Request for Information
  • Careers

    • Careers at PGIM
    • Job Opportunities
  • Newsroom

    • All News
    • Press Releases
    • In The News
    • Facts & Figures
    • Media Contacts
PGIM Logo
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Center
  • Accessibility Help
  • UK Regulatory Disclosures
  • Netherlands Regulatory Disclosures
  • Canadian Regulatory Disclosures
  • Ireland Gender Pay Gap Report
  • Cookie Preference Center

For Professional Investors only.* All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital.

This material is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation in respect of any products or services to any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or residence. PGIM is the principal asset management business of Prudential Financial, Inc. and a trading name of PGIM, Inc. and its global subsidiaries. PGIM, Inc. is a registered investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

The information on this website is not intended as investment advice and is not a recommendation about managing or investing your retirement savings. In making the information available on this website, PGIM, Inc. and its affiliates are not acting as your fiduciary.    

In the United Kingdom, this website may be issued by PGIM Private Alternatives (UK) Limited or PGIM Private Capital Limited.  In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), this website may be issued by PGIM Private Capital (Ireland) Limited or PGIM Luxembourg S.A. or PGIM Real Estate Germany AG.

PGIM, Inc. has its headquarters at 655 Broad Street, Newark, NJ 07102. PGIM Private Capital (Ireland) Limited has its registered office at IDA Business Park, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, F92 FP83, Ireland. PGIM Private Capital (Ireland) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and registered in Ireland under company number 635793 operating on the basis of a European passport. PGIM Limited and PGIM Private Alternatives (UK) Limited have their registered offices at Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London WC2N 5HR. PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number: 193418). PGIM Private Alternatives (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the FCA of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number: 181389). PGIM Private Capital Limited has its registered address at 1 London Bridge, London SE1 9BG and is authorised and regulated by the FCA of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number: 172071). PGIM Luxembourg S.A., Netherlands Branch is registered with the Netherlands Chamber of Commerce under number 85998877 and has its local offices at Gustav Mahlerlaan 1212, 1088LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PGIM Luxembourg S.A. has its registered address at 2 Boulevard de la Foire, L-1528 Luxembourg and is authorised and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (“CSSF”) in Luxembourg (registration number A00001218). PGIM Real Estate Germany AG has its registered address at Wittelsbacher Platz 1, 80333 Munchen, Germany and is authorised and regulated by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (“BaFin”) in Germany (registration number 10138142).

In Japan, information is provided by PGIM Japan Co., Ltd. (“PGIM Japan”) and/or PGIM Real Estate (Japan) Ltd. (“PGIMREJ”).  PGIM Japan, a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator with the Financial Services Agency of Japan offers various investment management services in Japan.  PGIMREJ is a Japanese real estate asset manager that is registered with the Kanto Local Finance Bureau of Japan.

In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571). In Singapore, information is issued by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“PGIM Singapore”), a regulated entity with the Monetary Authority of Singapore under a Capital Markets Services License to conduct fund management and an exempt financial adviser. This material is issued by PGIM Singapore for the general information of “institutional investors” pursuant to Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act 2001 of Singapore (the “SFA”) and “accredited investors” and other relevant persons in accordance with the conditions specified in Section 305 of the SFA. In South Korea, information is issued by PGIM, Inc., which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean qualified institutional investors on a cross-border basis.   

Prudential Financial, Inc. (“PFI”) of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. 

*PGIM.com/Podcasts and its content is intended for informational or educational purposes only and is not directed exclusively to Professional Investors. 

PGIM Logo
PGIM Logo

You are viewing this page in preview mode.

Edit Page