Equity

Stewardship

Our quantitative equity team is committed to being active stewards within the investment industry. Our stewardship platform includes company engagements, proxy voting, and collaborative industry engagements.

Our quantitative equity team aims to fulfil its stewardship responsibilities to further improve outcomes for the portfolios we manage for our clients. Stewardship is leveraged to address sustainability attributes such as climate, water usage, human rights, and other systemic sustainability issues, which are a focus of our stewardship objectives across various engagement approaches.

Engagement Overview

 

We believe it’s possible to proactively encourage companies to address material risks that they face and/or that do not align with best practices that have been shown to increase shareholder value.

 

Learn more about our Material Risk Engagement – 2024 Annual Report and 2024 Q4 Report.

 

The sustainability-focused portfolio construction process does not apply to all portfolios/strategies.

Proxy Voting Overview

 

As a responsible investor and fiduciary, our policy is to vote proxies in the best long-term economic interests of our clients.

Learn More

Collaboration & Reporting

 

We are dedicated to promoting responsible investment principles within the investment industry and maintaining the highest standards of transparency and communication.

responsible

Social Responsibility

 

Our commitment to social and corporate responsibility extends to our pledge to ensure diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace to honor the power of people.

Quantitative equity's PRI SCORECARD AND REPORTS

★ ★ ★ ★

Policy Governance and Strategy

★ ★ ★ ★

Direct - Listed Equity - Active Quantitative

★ ★ ★ ★

Confidence Building Measures

Read our UNPRI assessment and transparency reports below:

UN PRI ASSESSMENT REPORT

UN PRI TRANSPARENCY REPORT

Proxy Voting Record

Proxy voting metrics overview for year 2025 Period: Jan 01, 2025 through Dec 31, 2025. Source: PGIM, Glass Lewis

Management Proposals

Support was especially strong for routine governance and oversight matters. Audit and Financial, M&A proposals, and Changes to Company Statutes received majority support.

At the same time, opposition is concentrated in a small number of areas. Capital Management proposals received the highest level of opposition (20.5% voted against), followed by Compensation proposals (10.6% voted against). Voting scrutiny was focused primarily on capital allocation and executive pay matters.

 

Management proposals broken out by topic and whether the proxy votes supported or opposed management. Period: Jan 01, 2025 through Dec 31, 2025. Source: PGIM, Glass Lewis

Shareholder Proposals

 

Shareholder proposals were evaluated individually based on their merits and potential impact on long-term shareholder value. Where proposals addressed material issues, we assessed whether existing company practices already addressed the concern and whether the requested action would provide meaningful incremental benefit to shareholders. Many proposals were opposed because we concluded that the proposal was unnecessary, overly prescriptive, duplicative of existing practices, or unlikely to enhance shareholder value.

Where we voted in favor of shareholder proposals, we strongly believe they would be additive to shareholder value.  Governance, Compensation and Social issues saw the strongest support.

 

Shareholder proposals shown by topic and whether proxy votes supported, opposed, or abstained. Period: Jan 01, 2025 through Dec 31, 2025. Source: PGIM, Glass Lewis