Asian credit spreads denominated in U.S. dollars have held up surprisingly well since the tariff announcements in early April, retracing nearly 100% of the spread widening in the intervening months (Figure 1). This post examines five factors supporting the recent performance of Asian investment grade credit spreads and why that support should persist going forward.
Asian investment-grade spreads tightened more than 30 bps since early April, but have yet to return to their YTD tights.
Source: Bloomberg and J.P. Morgan, based on J.P. Morgan’s JACI IG credit spreads.
The U.S. dollar declined against most Asian currencies through the first half of 2025. As this occurred, Asia-based corporate and non-sovereign issuers increased their bond issuance in local currencies, curtailing their dollar-denominated issuance and consequently supporting USD spreads on their tightening trajectory.
Meanwhile, subsiding inflation pressures provided Asian central banks with the room to cut policy rates, further incentivizing issuance in local currencies. In contrast, the Federal Reserve remained in a holding pattern throughout the first three quarters of 2025 (see the blue shaded column in Figure 2). These policy rate differentials may persist if the Fed struggles to drop rates into accommodative territory—even as labor conditions deteriorate—considering the tariff-related inflation effects on the U.S. economy.
As the Fed held rates steady through most of 2025, Asian central banks eased monetary policy, improving issuers’ cost of capital. The Fed may struggle to cut rates into accommodative territory amidst tariff-related inflation effects.
Source: Fed Funds estimates and neutral policy estimates are from PGIM. Fed funds data are from the Federal Reserve. Aggregate Asia ex-Japan policy rates and estimates are from Morgan Stanley.
Indeed, the Reserve Bank of India has cut rates three times in 2025, and corporate issuance in India’s local bond market has grown by 25% to INR8.3 trillion since this time last year. Similarly, Bank Indonesia cut its policy rate three times this year, taking it from 6.0% to 5.3%, and corporate issuance in Indonesia’s local market is up 39% year-over-year to IDR84.4 trillion.
Issuance in Hong Kong’s local bond market (denominated in HKD) also staged a revival this year amidst lower borrowing costs. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority conducted a series of currency interventions to maintain the peg against the USD, which saw overnight borrowing costs fall to nearly zero.
The context from our first point dovetails into our second, which pertains to funding cost differentials between onshore local Asian markets and the U.S. dollar-denominated market. After U.S. interest rates repriced higher in 2022 and 2023 amid the Fed’s policy tightening cycle, higher funding costs also dissuaded issuers from coming to the USD market.
For example, the panels in Figure 3 show the hedged yields for similarly rated issuers in Indonesia, China, and South Korea. Hedged yields show noticeable savings for issuers who stay onshore in Indonesia and China (top panels of Figure 3). Although South Korean issuers might be indifferent between onshore and offshore issuance considering nearly equivalent levels, this also represents a change as historical USD funding costs are often lower than onshore costs for South Korean issuers (bottom panel of Figure 3).
Funding cost differentials may provide incentive to issue in the local onshore Indonesian and Chinese markets, while South Korean issuers may have their pick between onshore and USD whereas the latter is often cheaper.
Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Within EM debt mandates, global investors are generally maintaining their underweights in Asia, with the exception of India. Despite the broad underweight positioning, demand from traditional sources, such as Chinese banks as well as South Korean, Japanese, and Taiwanese life insurers, remains strong given that these regional buyers have historically anchored demand for Asian USD bonds. Considering the aforementioned dynamics of unfavorable USD funding costs relative to local currencies, demand from these anchor investors may strengthen amidst the dearth of USD supply.
As an example of this consistent demand, Figure 4 shows the performance of select Chinese and South Korean hard currency issues thus far in 2025. Following early April’s spread widening, Chinese A rated spreads quickly compressed inside of their YTD tights, while China BBB spreads returned to their YTD tights by early August. Within China’s BBB segment, tech names stand out as outperformers, compressing from an average spread of about 100 bps over government debt to about 60 bps. A similar trend is evident in South Korean IG spreads with both A and BBB rated names retracing almost all of their widening since early April. In addition to ongoing demand from Asian-anchor investors, this year’s spread recovery also indicates that investors appear to be putting aside their worries on China’s slowdown and on U.S.-China trade tensions.
Asian IG credit spread performance indicates the continued presence of Asia’s anchor investors as well as fading concerns about China’s economic recovery and its U.S. trade relationship.
Source: Bloomberg and PGIM
Asia’s large anchor investors are part of an estimated US$3.5 trillion of aggregate demand in Asian countries for non-domestic bonds, including for developed market issues.1 This demand has been more apparent in recent years as Asian investors increased their 2025 allocations to USD Asian bonds to the highest level since 2021 (Figure 5). This aggregate demand from Asian countries should also support Asian dollar-denominated spreads considering the diversification of issuance into local markets and the corresponding lack of dollar-denominated supply.
Asian investors increased their allocations to a contracting USD Asian debt market to a multi-year high thus far in 2025.
Source: J.P. Morgan
As the size of the Asian USD credit market contracts, we have also observed greater participation by Chinese institutions in recent investment grade transactions out of the Middle East (Figure 6). We think net creditor Asian countries—i.e., China, South Korea, Japan, etc.—will likely continue deploying cash in global EM amidst the uncertainty pertaining to U.S. monetary, fiscal, and political policies.
Asia’s USD credit market has been contracting since late 2021.
Source: Morgan Stanley
The contraction in Asia’s USD credit market over the past several years appears set to continue with flat net supply thus far in 2025. Asia’s credit market absorbed US$106 billion in supply year-to-date, essentially matching its U.S. dollar-denominated maturities.
However, the region’s net supply picture is more nuanced by country. At the start of the year, Asia was facing US$166bn of aggregate bond maturities, of which US$101 billion was from China and US$23 billion was from Korea. Thus far in 2025, China has had negative net supply of US$36.5 billion, by far the largest Asian country in terms of supply deficit. Furthermore, the contribution of China’s issuance to Asia’s total YTD supply stands at 36%, below 2024’s contribution of 40% and well below historical peaks of about 60% observed between 2017 to 2021.
China’s negative net supply has positively affected spreads on China-related issuers, creating a pool of demand as existing bonds mature. This demand is driven by Chinese banks and local asset managers, who have home bias and prefer to invest their USD holdings in Chinese companies.
When looking ahead, we think a combination of all the five factors specified above are unique to Asia’s credit markets, and provide areas to monitor as the global investment landscape evolves. Indeed, given signs that inflows into emerging market debt may continue, the combination of the factors and continued EM inflows likely bode well for Asia’s hard currency spreads and current valuations going forward.
1 The demand estimate is based on holdings of non-domestic bonds by life insurers, pensions, and sovereign wealth funds.
Source(s) of data (unless otherwise noted): PGIM Fixed Income, as of August 2025.
For Professional Investors only. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results and an investment could lose value. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital.
PGIM Fixed Income operates primarily through PGIM, Inc., a registered investment adviser under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and a Prudential Financial, Inc. (“PFI”) company. Registration as a registered investment adviser does not imply a certain level or skill or training. PGIM Fixed Income is headquartered in Newark, New Jersey and also includes the following businesses globally: (i) the public fixed income unit within PGIM Limited, located in London; (ii) PGIM Netherlands B.V., located in Amsterdam; (iii) PGIM Japan Co., Ltd. (“PGIM Japan”), located in Tokyo; (iv) the public fixed income unit within PGIM (Hong Kong) Ltd. located in Hong Kong; and (v) the public fixed income unit within PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., located in Singapore (“PGIM Singapore”). PFI of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. Prudential, PGIM, their respective logos, and the Rock symbol are service marks of PFI and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.
These materials are for informational or educational purposes only. The information is not intended as investment advice and is not a recommendation about managing or investing assets. In providing these materials, PGIM is not acting as your fiduciary. PGIM Fixed Income as a general matter provides services to qualified institutions, financial intermediaries and institutional investors. Investors seeking information regarding their particular investment needs should contact their own financial professional.
These materials represent the views and opinions of the author(s) regarding the economic conditions, asset classes, securities, issuers or financial instruments referenced herein. Distribution of this information to any person other than the person to whom it was originally delivered and to such person’s advisers is unauthorized, and any reproduction of these materials, in whole or in part, or the divulgence of any of the contents hereof, without prior consent of PGIM Fixed Income is prohibited. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from sources that PGIM Fixed Income believes to be reliable as of the date presented; however, PGIM Fixed Income cannot guarantee the accuracy of such information, assure its completeness, or warrant such information will not be changed. The information contained herein is current as of the date of issuance (or such earlier date as referenced herein) and is subject to change without notice. PGIM Fixed Income has no obligation to update any or all of such information; nor do we make any express or implied warranties or representations as to the completeness or accuracy.
Any forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be interpreted as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation, nor as the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and unlike an actual performance record, do not reflect actual trading, liquidity constraints, fee. These materials are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliates may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views expressed herein, including for proprietary accounts of PGIM Fixed Income or its affiliates.
Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and low-interest rate environments increase this risk. Reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. Mortgage- and asset-backed securities may be sensitive to changes in interest rates, subject to early repayment risk, and while generally supported by a government, government agency or private guarantor, there is no assurance that the guarantor will meet its obligations. High yield, lower-rated securities involve greater risk than higher-rated securities; portfolios that invest in them may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than portfolios that do not. Investing in foreign-denominated and/or -domiciled securities may involve heightened risk due to currency fluctuations, and economic and political risks, which may be enhanced in emerging markets. Currency rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time and may reduce the returns of a portfolio. Commodities contain heightened risk, including market, political, regulatory and natural conditions, and may not be suitable for all investors. Diversification does not ensure against loss.
In the United Kingdom, information is issued by PGIM Limited with registered office: Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5HR.PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number 193418). In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), information is issued by PGIM Netherlands B.V., an entity authorised by the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”) in the Netherlands and operating on the basis of a European passport. In certain EEA countries, information is, where permitted, presented by PGIM Limited in reliance of provisions, exemptions or licenses available to PGIM Limited including those available under temporary permission arrangements following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. These materials are issued by PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. to persons who are professional clients as defined under the rules of the FCA and/or to persons who are professional clients as defined in the relevant local implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). In Switzerland, information is issued by PGIM Limited, London, through its Representative Office in Zurich with registered office: Kappelergasse 14, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland. PGIM Limited, London, Representative Office in Zurich is authorised and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA and these materials are issued to persons who are professional or institutional clients within the meaning of Art.4 para 3 and 4 FinSA in Switzerland. In certain countries in Asia-Pacific, information is presented by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., a regulated entity with the Monetary Authority of Singapore under a Capital Markets Services License to conduct fund management and an exempt financial adviser. In Japan, information is presented by PGIM Japan Co. Ltd., registered investment adviser with the Japanese Financial Services Agency. In South Korea, information is presented by PGIM, Inc., which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean investors. In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571). In Australia, this information is presented by PGIM (Australia) Pty Ltd (“PGIM Australia”) for the general information of its “wholesale” customers (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001). PGIM Australia is a representative of PGIM Limited, which is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services License under the Australian Corporations Act 2001 in respect of financial services. PGIM Limited is exempt by virtue of its regulation by the FCA (Reg: 193418) under the laws of the United Kingdom and the application of ASIC Class Order 03/1099. The laws of the United Kingdom differ from Australian laws. In Canada, pursuant to the international adviser registration exemption in National Instrument 31-103, PGIM, Inc. is informing you that: (1) PGIM, Inc. is not registered in Canada and is advising you in reliance upon an exemption from the adviser registration requirement under National Instrument 31-103; (2) PGIM, Inc.’s jurisdiction of residence is New Jersey, U.S.A.; (3) there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against PGIM, Inc. because it is resident outside of Canada and all or substantially all of its assets may be situated outside of Canada; and (4) the name and address of the agent for service of process of PGIM, Inc. in the applicable Provinces of Canada are as follows: in Québec: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 1000 de La Gauchetière Street West, Suite 900 Montréal, QC H3B 5H4; in British Columbia: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 1200 Waterfront Centre, 200 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V7X 1T2; in Ontario: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3400, Toronto, ON M5H 4E3; in Nova Scotia: Cox & Palmer, Q.C., 1100 Purdy’s Wharf Tower One, 1959 Upper Water Street, P.O. Box 2380 -Stn Central RPO, Halifax, NS B3J 3E5; in Alberta: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 530 Third Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P R3.
© 2025 PFI and its related entities.
2025-6783
Collapse Section